Gone Posted September 2, 2014 Share Posted September 2, 2014 So you have no evidence, yet you believe you are correct. Either a troll, or very stupid. Jason Collins has an identical twin, Jaron, who was “astounded†to discover that his brother had entered into the homosexual lifestyle. He, despite sharing Jason’s identical DNA, is as straight as a laser beam. Identical twins share straits that are genetically determined: height, skin color, eye color, hair color and so forth. If homosexuality is a genetically-caused sexual preference, Jaron Collins should be as gay as his brother. He’s not. You're either a troll or very stupid. Probably both. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gent♥ Posted September 2, 2014 Author Share Posted September 2, 2014 Jason Collins has an identical twin, Jaron, who was “astounded†to discover that his brother had entered into the homosexual lifestyle. He, despite sharing Jason’s identical DNA, is as straight as a laser beam. Identical twins share straits that are genetically determined: height, skin color, eye color, hair color and so forth. If homosexuality is a genetically-caused sexual preference, Jaron Collins should be as gay as his brother. He’s not. You're either a troll or very stupid. Probably both. Link us, to prove you didn't just pull that out of your ass. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gone Posted September 2, 2014 Share Posted September 2, 2014 Link us, to prove you didn't just pull that out of your ass.I can't find it but I found this http://www.onenewsnow.com/perspectives/bryan-fischer/2014/06/17/the-latest-in-scientific-research-there-is-no-gay-gene Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gent♥ Posted September 2, 2014 Author Share Posted September 2, 2014 I can't find it So, it was bullcrap, then. Also, that link? http://www.onenewsnow.com/general/about Nothing more than Christian propaganda. Try getting some information from an unbiased source. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deathmonkey14 Posted September 2, 2014 Share Posted September 2, 2014 I can't find it but I found this http://www.onenewsnow.com/perspectives/bryan-fischer/2014/06/17/the-latest-in-scientific-research-there-is-no-gay-gene This is a forum of bp.tf. 1 link does not make something true Its also good to not have biased sites tl;dr need more unsolds Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gone Posted September 2, 2014 Share Posted September 2, 2014 So, it was bullcrap, then. Also, that link? http://www.onenewsnow.com/general/about Nothing more than Christian propaganda. Try getting some information from an unbiased source. Lol! Can't find anything to counter it? Facts are facts doesn't matter who found them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gone Posted September 2, 2014 Share Posted September 2, 2014 This is a forum of bp.tf. 1 link does not make something true tl;dr need more unsolds A gay gene simply cannot exist. If there ever was a gay gene, it would have passed out of the gene pool long before now. Any gene that prevents male-female copulation cannot be passed on to offspring. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grimes Posted September 2, 2014 Share Posted September 2, 2014 I can't find it but I found this http://www.onenewsnow.com/perspectives/bryan-fischer/2014/06/17/the-latest-in-scientific-research-there-is-no-gay-gene Could not have chosen a more biased, religious, right-wing website. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gent♥ Posted September 2, 2014 Author Share Posted September 2, 2014 http://www.independent.co.uk/news/the-gay-gene-is-back-on-the-scene-1536770.htmlTop result from searching 'gay gene.' Well fucking done. EDIT:http://www.theguardian.com/science/2014/feb/14/genes-influence-male-sexual-orientation-study Proofhttp://www.ibtimes.com/does-gay-gene-exist-new-study-says-xq28-may-influence-male-sexual-orientation-1555564 Youhttp://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/assault/genetics/nyreview.html Arehttp://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2559021/Being-gay-DNA-researchers-claim-controversial-new-study.html Anhttp://www.christianpost.com/news/born-that-way-new-research-on-gay-genes-raises-new-questions-few-answers-114651/ Idiot Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grimes Posted September 2, 2014 Share Posted September 2, 2014 Lol! Can't find anything to counter it? Facts are facts doesn't matter who found them. http://content.time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,1815538,00.html http://www.science20.com/news_releases/homosexuality_a_result_of_genetics_and_random_environmental_factors_says_twins_study Both credible websites, try reading them and broadening your view instead of sticking to your argument that is based on personal opinion, not fact. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vince Posted September 2, 2014 Share Posted September 2, 2014 Let me put it this way: Bags you had reason to put your nose in Gent's business and then harass gent about it. He/she chooses to be openly gay, a person can love who they love, this isnt the 19th century now, we need to learn respect a person for who they are. most of us here are the leaders or the voice of tomorrow, let us learn to accept one another. Gent believes that it was something he/she was born with (as well as most all gays). So lets stop the flamewar and respect each other Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gone Posted September 2, 2014 Share Posted September 2, 2014 http://www.independent.co.uk/news/the-gay-gene-is-back-on-the-scene-1536770.html Top result from seatching 'gay gene.' Well fucking done. EDIT: http://www.theguardian.com/science/2014/feb/14/genes-influence-male-sexual-orientation-study Proof http://www.ibtimes.com/does-gay-gene-exist-new-study-says-xq28-may-influence-male-sexual-orientation-1555564 You http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/assault/genetics/nyreview.html Are http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2559021/Being-gay-DNA-researchers-claim-controversial-new-study.html An http://www.christianpost.com/news/born-that-way-new-research-on-gay-genes-raises-new-questions-few-answers-114651/ Idiot Your first link is from 1995 lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vince Posted September 2, 2014 Share Posted September 2, 2014 Your first link is from 1995 lol. history never changes. Research never changes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grimes Posted September 2, 2014 Share Posted September 2, 2014 Your first link is from 1995 lol. Your argument is from the bible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gent♥ Posted September 2, 2014 Author Share Posted September 2, 2014 Your first link is from 1995 lol. And the other five? Hmmmm? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gone Posted September 2, 2014 Share Posted September 2, 2014 Let me put it this way: Bags you had reason to put your nose in Gent's business and then harass gent about it. He/she chooses to be openly gay, a person can love who they love, this isnt the 19th century now, we need to learn respect a person for who they are. most of us here are the leaders or the voice of tomorrow, let us learn to accept one another. Gent believes that it was something he/she was born with (as well as most all gays). So lets stop the flamewar and respect each other Actually he started all this. I just said I can't believe there are people sick enough to like certain fetishes and then he said it's never a choice just like being gay. And I said being gay is a choice. So actually he started all this. Then we decided to go to PM discuss this but apparently he doesn't know PM means Private Messages and made this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gone Posted September 2, 2014 Share Posted September 2, 2014 And the other five? Hmmmm? How about instead of posting links which don't counter hBryan's argument you actually counter what he said as everything he said was correct. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gent♥ Posted September 2, 2014 Author Share Posted September 2, 2014 Actually he started all this. I just said I can't believe there are people sick enough to like certain fetishes and then he said it's never a choice just like being gay. And I said being gay is a choice. So actually he started all this. Then we decided to go to PM discuss this but apparently he doesn't know PM means Private Messages and made this. Because I felt I couldn't keep the little treasure that is you all to myself. And you started this by having equally shallow-minded views just on a different topic. I gave you an analogy that should have clarified things, not at all realising you're a bible-bashing, thick-skulled, ignorant.... and I'd finish that sentence, but I refuse to turn this into ad hominem tu quoque. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ϟRai-Raiϟ Posted September 2, 2014 Share Posted September 2, 2014 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grimes Posted September 2, 2014 Share Posted September 2, 2014 How about instead of posting links which don't counter hBryan's argument you actually counter what he said as everything he said was correct. http://content.time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,1815538,00.html http://www.science20.com/news_releases/homosexuality_a_result_of_genetics_and_random_environmental_factors_says_twins_study Both credible websites, try reading them and broadening your view instead of sticking to your argument that is based on personal opinion, not fact. Maybe you should stop ignoring the links I post m9. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gent♥ Posted September 2, 2014 Author Share Posted September 2, 2014 How about instead of posting links which don't counter hBryan's argument you actually counter what he said as everything he said was correct. THEY DO COUNTER HIS ARGUMENT READ THEMMMMM XQ28 IS GAY GENE FROM MULTIPLE SOURCES READDDDDDDDD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
frank mcdank Posted September 2, 2014 Share Posted September 2, 2014 por que no los dos? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gone Posted September 2, 2014 Share Posted September 2, 2014 Because I felt I couldn't keep the little treasure that is you all to myself. And you started this by having equally shallow-minded views just on a different topic. I gave you an analogy that should have clarified things, not at all realising you're a bible-bashing, thick-skulled, ignorant.... and I'd finish that sentence, but I refuse to turn this into ad hominem tu quoque. Thick skulled? Your the one that got mad because he couldn't counter my posts so you decided to let a community which is almost complete atheists ,so they believe you are gay because of genes, fight your battles for you.Me ignorant? I think not as you couldn't handle arguing against me and need others to help you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
♥Prof. Sugarcube♥ Posted September 2, 2014 Share Posted September 2, 2014 Waitwait, just to be clear; (I'm not involved in this war) Bags is using the Bible? The Bible was never meant to be taken LITERALLY. ._. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gone Posted September 2, 2014 Share Posted September 2, 2014 THEY DO COUNTER HIS ARGUMENT READ THEMMMMM XQ28 IS GAY GENE FROM MULTIPLE SOURCES READDDDDDDDD How about you read my link? It counters what those links say. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.