puddingkip Posted December 10, 2013 Share Posted December 10, 2013 So why exactly was this accepted? http://backpack.tf/vote/id/52a609cf4cd7b8221a8b4587 He has shown us some solds at the already existing low-end. His additional proof is: 1 sold in 2 hours, 1 guy that obviously changed price, 1 guy that doesn't really bump too often and 1 proper unsold for 2 days. How is that acceptable proof? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roller Posted December 10, 2013 Share Posted December 10, 2013 Even though his proof are bad, I think Michael noticed that this item needs a drop? He often does something like that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
puddingkip Posted December 10, 2013 Author Share Posted December 10, 2013 Even though his proof are bad, I think Michael noticed that this item needs a drop? He often does something like that well I think he should have put an explanatory comment if he did so. but maybe he was too busy or something Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xosmin Posted December 26, 2013 Share Posted December 26, 2013 well, most of the suggestions accepted by him are based on 'Michael noticed that this item needs a drop'. the fact that half of the unsolds are sold or the the lower range is backed up by quicksells has no more relevance. you guys are changing the prices based on the fact that 'Michael noticed that this item needs a drop'. i'm not talking about this suggestion in partticular. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.