Man: Good or bad?

[AwesomeMcCoolName]

yeah. but they dont go into the territory of stronger animals, aka humans. if we encounter a stronger animal which has what we want, what do we do? slaughter the

 

while how we treat the earth is something we can do something about. which we dont give a shit for.

Weaker animals don't go fighting stronger animals because if they did, they would die. Thats a highly flawed argument....Humans don't do that either....

 

And you clearly don't give a shit about the earth since every breath you take, every mile you drive, every meal you eat pollutes the earth a little bit more. So if humanity is such a plague on the earth and does nothing but good---Why are you still living on it? Would suicide not be the logical conclusion since we don't do anything beneficial anyway?

[There]

a huge form of murders is because of love. thats not a territory.

we do shit to the enviroment, freons, co2, kill forest. everything we do seem to have negative impact on the lifespan of earth.

when do you hear about animals that charge into human territory to get it back? insanely rarely. when do you see humans charging into animal kingdom killing everything to put down farms? every day.

forest fires, volcanic eruptions etc is something noone can do something about. it just happens. except for forest fires, a large number of those are started by humans.

 

"Man is bad because man kills man"

 

So is there a problem?

[AwesomeMcCoolName]

"Man is bad because man kills man"

But man is bad, so man is killing something thats bad--making man good. But then man is killing something good, which makes him bad. Shit, wait, but then he's killing something bad that makes him good. 

[Baloo]

I, personally, subscribe to the idea set forth in Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde: "man is not truly, one but two"

 

Our world, or at least how we perceive it, is not black and white. We have the ability to argue the good and bad for any course of action, so why can it not be true that ourselves have the same gray area within us? Human life would be rather dull if man was set in stone as either good or evil, in fact, if everyone were evil; would it even be possible to conceive that everyone is evil? The same question applies for good. There is a reason these words exist in our society, and it is because our world contains both, and holds both within each of the organisms that inhabit it. It plays into the idea of Yin and Yang passed down by Chinese philosophers in which a segment of good, and a segment of evil rest inside each other as they intertwine conveying that all actions may carry a bright or dark side with them against their original intent.

[Christley </3 Peelz]

Weaker animals don't go fighting stronger animals because if they did, they would die. Thats a highly flawed argument....Humans don't do that either....

 

And you clearly don't give a shit about the earth since every breath you take, every mile you drive, every meal you eat pollutes the earth a little bit more. So if humanity is such a plague on the earth and does nothing but good---Why are you still living on it? Would suicide not be the logical conclusion since we don't do anything beneficial anyway?

humans arent the strongest animals. humans have the strongest tools which make them the strongest fighters. so yeah, the weaker animal attacks the stronger to gain more.

 

if you're gonna be like that, then i might aswell blow the earth up? because if a vulcano takes a breath, it pollutes a tiny bit. then its a bad thing if you take my arguments as extreme as that.

every animal pollutes, but does bears have coal powerplants? does deers drive oiltankers? does elephants drive cars? no. they dont. humans do

[AwesomeMcCoolName]

humans arent the strongest animals. humans have the strongest tools which make them the strongest fighters. so yeah, the weaker animal attacks the stronger to gain more.

 

if you're gonna be like that, then i might aswell blow the earth up? because if a vulcano takes a breath, it pollutes a tiny bit. then its a bad thing if you take my arguments as extreme as that.

every animal pollutes, but does bears have coal powerplants? does deers drive oiltankers? does elephants drive cars? no. they dont. humans do

Because strongest must mean physically stronger and not mentally right? 

 

And you've made your point quite clear, animals are natural, so any damage they do is natural. The earth is natural, so any damage it does is natural. Humans are the only ones who cause "unnatural" damage. Therefore destroying the planet wouldn't make any sense, but killing yourself would.