Emmy! Posted November 20, 2015 Share Posted November 20, 2015 So, the UN put in place the Geneva Protocol which didn't really work out that well. Sure, the use of chemical and biological weapons were banned but the production and storage and trade of them still continued. ISIS are even attempting to create chemical weapons, which led to France producing Serin Gas antidotes for every emergency service. What's a solution to end all this chemical weapon nonsense? The US tried bombing the supplies but that just lead to contamination... ggwp lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NotWarlizard Posted November 20, 2015 Share Posted November 20, 2015 There isn't a solution, if there were a solution there wouldn't be a problem with chemical weapons. If someone will the knowledge wants to create chemical weapons they'll do it, simple as that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
krawtch Posted November 20, 2015 Share Posted November 20, 2015 The worlds scientific minds and military tactitians can't find a solution for chemical weapons, but you think it can be found in a video game pixel trading website community forum. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chilled Soda Posted November 20, 2015 Share Posted November 20, 2015 no humans = no weapons Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hyperqube Posted November 20, 2015 Share Posted November 20, 2015 no humans = no weapons Captive western lowland gorillas have been observed to threaten each other with sticks and larger pieces of wood ... Research in 2007 showed that common chimpanzees sharpen sticks to use as weapons when hunting mammals ... In March 2009, it was reported that "Santino", a male chimpanzee in Furuvik zoo (Sweden), had planned hundreds of stone-throwing attacks on visitors to the zoo ... There have been reported cases of woodpecker finches brandishing a twig as a weapon -- wikipedia :'( Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chilled Soda Posted November 20, 2015 Share Posted November 20, 2015 Captive western lowland gorillas have been observed to threaten each other with sticks and larger pieces of wood ... Research in 2007 showed that common chimpanzees sharpen sticks to use as weapons when hunting mammals ... In March 2009, it was reported that "Santino", a male chimpanzee in Furuvik zoo (Sweden), had planned hundreds of stone-throwing attacks on visitors to the zoo ... There have been reported cases of woodpecker finches brandishing a twig as a weapon -- wikipedia :'( sorry no humans = no weapons of mass destruction designed to flatten cities or wipe out entire groups of the same species as quickly or as painfully as possible better? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cąℓσceđrus ☁☽ Posted November 22, 2015 Share Posted November 22, 2015 stop supporting violent non defensive ideologies Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NotWarlizard Posted November 22, 2015 Share Posted November 22, 2015 stop supporting violent non defensive ideologies lolwut? who are you responding because no one here is supporting anything. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cąℓσceđrus ☁☽ Posted November 22, 2015 Share Posted November 22, 2015 lolwut? who are you responding because no one here is supporting anything. answer to the op question Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Emmy! Posted November 22, 2015 Author Share Posted November 22, 2015 The worlds scientific minds and military tactitians can't find a solution for chemical weapons, but you think it can be found in a video game pixel trading website community forum. do i look like im working for the fucking UN? im looking for opinions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cąℓσceđrus ☁☽ Posted November 22, 2015 Share Posted November 22, 2015 the only ways to stop the use of these chemical weapons now that they alledgedly have access to them is to kill them all or convince them that what they are killing for is not worth it the first option is probably more realistic unless whatever chemicals are used can be left inert by an anti chemical weapon chemical weapon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hyperqube Posted November 22, 2015 Share Posted November 22, 2015 The US tried bombing the supplies but that just lead to contamination...depends on what the chemical substance is. high temperature incendairy bombs might do the trick without a problem Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.