Suggestion Question: Halloween Spell: Team Spirit Footprints, 6-8 ref, polar

[♫ MoPcKo cBuH4e :d]

This is the suggestion - http://backpack.tf/vote/id/545c5416ba8d889e518b4b7b

 

So clearly 4 links don't represent the market, yet it got accepted. I was neutral on it as I knew eventually this may happen. Yes, classifieds supported the range, but there was no unsolds at high end, not much proof, etc.

 

Want to know why suggestions like this gets accepted. This is almost no effort. Like Plaxorous said it's just not fair. Why should I spend time making suggestions like this one - http://backpack.tf/vote/id/545a7882ba8d8826228b5311 when I can put 3 links and It can get accepted...

 

Cmon, this doesn't feels right. Want explanation.

[DiamondHavoc.]

What iz modz doing? D:

[polar]

As Michael already addressed in the previous, similar suggestion question, if the range is accurate and the votes are positive, we'll accept suggestions like these. This one was blatantly obvious with a quick look at the SCM prices and classifieds. It might even be too high. Those prices suggest that it should actually be closer to 5 flat.

 

Think about it this way, why would we close a suggestion that's WAY more accurate than the current price. If you are a trader, would you want the listed price to stay at 6-8 ref. If you bought for 8 ref looking at the current bp price, wouldn't you be pissed if you learned that an accurate suggestion at 5-6 ref was closed? I would. 

[♫ MoPcKo cBuH4e :d]

Fair enough, polar. I didn't said the price was wrong. It was better than the one suggested but there was almost no proof. But I guess you're right. It's better to have an accurate price. You can lock this.