peedo bear Posted October 24, 2014 Share Posted October 24, 2014 What do you guys think if so then when will they. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grimes Posted October 24, 2014 Share Posted October 24, 2014 Yes, when iraq asks them too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vince Posted October 24, 2014 Share Posted October 24, 2014 What do you guys think if so then when will they. why don't you stop worrying about ISIS and start worrying about that math assignment you have to do Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seminal Inhalation Posted October 24, 2014 Share Posted October 24, 2014 why don't you stop worrying about ISIS and start worrying about that math assignment you have to do Doesn't help the fact that he has ADOLF HITLER as his profile picture. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cedarium Posted October 24, 2014 Share Posted October 24, 2014 why don't you stop worrying about ISIS and start worrying about that math assignment you have to doRekt Also, if you put a topic in a serious subforum you should have better choices than "tacos" and "Osama bin laden". That kind of stuff belongs in the GB. That aside, you should've made the poll so that you could only choose one option. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heated Bread Posted October 24, 2014 Share Posted October 24, 2014 If the united states does not put in ground troops, eventually someone will have to. It's sad because U.S. involvement (toppling saddam and setting up a government that was inept and a military that was unwilling to protect the country because they didn't care) contributed a significant portion to creating the situation. IMO, iraq should have been split into 3 smaller countries. That would have been a lot harder to do though. But in the long run, I think it would have been for the best, because the different sects in iraq don't seem to care about iraq at all. They only seem to care about their own sect. ISIS is a human rights nightmare, and they will harm the surrounding region and their ideology will lead to further aggression towards western countries. The U.N. are probably not equipped to deal with the situation without the U.S. military (and the mercenary forces which they hire). It's a big mess and I think sending in ground troops is inevitable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Depression is ass Posted October 24, 2014 Share Posted October 24, 2014 If the united states does not put in ground troops, eventually someone will have to. It's sad because U.S. involvement (toppling saddam and setting up a government that was inept and a military that was unwilling to protect the country because they didn't care) contributed a significant portion to creating the situation. IMO, iraq should have been split into 3 smaller countries. That would have been a lot harder to do though. But in the long run, I think it would have been for the best, because the different sects in iraq don't seem to care about iraq at all. They only seem to care about their own sect. All I know is that Aussies are part of the "war" and only sent ground troops to train and advice Iraqi forces but the US might send to defend wherever they train as their not meant to attack them directly except air And I put quote marks on war as its still blurry wherever this is a war or not Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KaiZeR Van WiZe™ Posted October 24, 2014 Share Posted October 24, 2014 TO NARNIA!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grimes Posted October 24, 2014 Share Posted October 24, 2014 only sent ground troops to train and advice Iraqi forces I would bet good money against that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Depression is ass Posted October 24, 2014 Share Posted October 24, 2014 I would bet good money against that. http://www.canberratimes.com.au/federal-politics/political-news/defence-chief-flags-longer-training-job-in-iraq-20141023-11a3py.html Some proof they are doing it this is just a link saying their making it longer But they may have to resort to fighting IS if they overwhelm. For now I'm staying on the training but leaning to fighting Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grimes Posted October 24, 2014 Share Posted October 24, 2014 http://www.canberratimes.com.au/federal-politics/political-news/defence-chief-flags-longer-training-job-in-iraq-20141023-11a3py.html Some proof they are doing it this is just a link saying their making it longer But they may have to resort to fighting IS if they overwhelm. For now I'm staying on the training but leaning to fighting Just because they say that it doesn't make it true. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Depression is ass Posted October 24, 2014 Share Posted October 24, 2014 Just because they say that it doesn't make it true. True but PM confirmed it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grimes Posted October 24, 2014 Share Posted October 24, 2014 True but PM confirmed it Just because they say that it doesn't make it true. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Depression is ass Posted October 24, 2014 Share Posted October 24, 2014 ^ Okay you've got me, I'm gonna be neutray But you've got some trust issues no offence Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grimes Posted October 24, 2014 Share Posted October 24, 2014 ^ Okay you've got me, I'm gonna be neutray But you've got some trust issues no offence Maybe you're just naive? Who knows mahnnn Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ixenzo Posted October 24, 2014 Share Posted October 24, 2014 tacos Taco tuesday everyday. They will. Eventually. Nothing has stopped US from intervening states they have caused war conflict in yet. They also have to dump this war budget somewhere. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Radiated Banana Posted October 24, 2014 Share Posted October 24, 2014 They cant really do it without permission from iraq Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
F CHARLIE Posted October 24, 2014 Share Posted October 24, 2014 I don't believe we will. Our strategy is to do airstrikes and wait until the Iraqi army is ready and can do this. Also,we will now support the original Syrian rebels and hopefully they can make their country free as a result. Some have suggested using Black water troops again but that is a mistake. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
w0lk Posted October 24, 2014 Share Posted October 24, 2014 Yes, my brother was told that he will get deployed to Iraq soon, but he still doesn't know the exact date. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
F CHARLIE Posted October 24, 2014 Share Posted October 24, 2014 Yes, my brother was told that he will get deployed to Iraq soon, but he still doesn't know the exact date. What does he do? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
w0lk Posted October 24, 2014 Share Posted October 24, 2014 What does he do? Combat Medic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
puddingkip Posted October 24, 2014 Share Posted October 24, 2014 Combat Medic. He might also just go there with the "advisors" they sent/are sending if you trust the governments words on no boots on the ground. But Vietnam started with advisors, CIA and their bodyguards... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
F CHARLIE Posted October 25, 2014 Share Posted October 25, 2014 He might also just go there with the "advisors" they sent/are sending if you trust the governments words on no boots on the ground. But Vietnam started with advisors, CIA and their bodyguards... The progression from advisors to combat trooms only occurs with the will of the people and the impatiance of both the leadership and the people. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tanner the Original Scout™ Posted October 25, 2014 Share Posted October 25, 2014 No because Obama is waiting for the fight to come to us, for some reason. Once it's too late then he'll deploy troops in the Middle East. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grimes Posted October 25, 2014 Share Posted October 25, 2014 No because Obama is waiting for the fight to come to us, for some reason. Once it's too late then he'll deploy troops in the Middle East. Somehow I think that they have thought it through just a little bit more than that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.