CourtneyWendysCommercials Posted August 30, 2015 Share Posted August 30, 2015 Do you like crisp factory new weapons? Do you like a couple scratches on your boomstick? Do you prefer a weapon that shows a history of roughness? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheVenomWith1n Posted August 30, 2015 Share Posted August 30, 2015 none of them. I once owned an MW scattergun, had a shit ton of scratches on it and looked like it was at least WW Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
praise Posted August 30, 2015 Share Posted August 30, 2015 Depends on the skin. If it's a high tier skin for the scattergun (something like Current Event), I prefer it to be as Factory New looking as possible. I wouldn't mind minimum wear scratches on a King of the Jungle skin for the minigun though. Overall, it really depends on the tier and type of the skin for me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain Caboose Posted August 30, 2015 Share Posted August 30, 2015 I like FN 0.001 or MW 0.2s cus sometimes they look identical even though the big float gap Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Veteran Eagle Posted August 30, 2015 Share Posted August 30, 2015 Minimal Wear is usually my preferred, since I don't want too many scratches on my gun to the point where it looks like a piece of crap I got from the garbage dump. Field-Tested might work, though it still has a bit too many scratches for my taste. However, Factory New simply seems to clean for me and makes me look like a sissy who prioritizes keeping his gun safe like a coward. Some guns do look nice with a ton of scratches on them, though, such as the Night Owl and Shot in the Dark Sniper Rifles. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weedoof Posted August 30, 2015 Share Posted August 30, 2015 I like battle scarred because I don't really give a shit so long as it has some bloodstains and I'm pretty sure BS is the most likely to have them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xolono II Posted August 30, 2015 Share Posted August 30, 2015 BS on SOME skins otherwise FN. I once had a Current Event MW. Looked like it was FT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hatrix Posted August 30, 2015 Share Posted August 30, 2015 My opinion on the whole wears thing is that in CS:GO, if it's not MW or FN, in most cases it just looks like shit because that's how the art style of the game is. But in TF2, everything's barely working, broke down shit made up of just parts. I mean, just look at the maps, these cartoonish wooden structures that look like they should fall apart, trains that run people over, that sort of stuff. Even the weapons look strapped together, the Medic's Ubersaw looks like it's made of spare rusted blades, a huge syringe and a collection basin all bolted together. I actually think that the lesser quality skins looks as good as the MW and FN ones because they all fit with the art style of the game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taconinja Posted August 30, 2015 Share Posted August 30, 2015 My opinion on the whole wears thing is that in CS:GO, if it's not MW or FN, in most cases it just looks like shit because that's how the art style of the game is. But in TF2, everything's barely working, broke down shit made up of just parts. I mean, just look at the maps, these cartoonish wooden structures that look like they should fall apart, trains that run people over, that sort of stuff. Even the weapons look strapped together, the Medic's Ubersaw looks like it's made of spare rusted blades, a huge syringe and a collection basin all bolted together. I actually think that the lesser quality skins looks as good as the MW and FN ones because they all fit with the art style of the game. I like FT, WW, and BS a lot in csgo but not in tf2, its all just this grey garbage Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MM720 Posted August 31, 2015 Share Posted August 31, 2015 Factory New tbh. I know it's mainstream and I've done my best to like FT/BS more but if half/over half the paint of my gun is scratched away then I might as well use stock and if it's MW it has so few scratches that I might as well want a FN to look better. I like Field-Tested the second most but I've had FT guns look like battle scarred and some that look like minimal wear/almost factory new so it depends on the gun :/ For example on shotgun skins I'm perfectly ok with FT and even WW but for Medi Gun skins everything below MW is trash and not worth bothering it for me (I'll just use stock instead) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toxins Posted August 31, 2015 Share Posted August 31, 2015 I go on a weapon-by-weapon basis. Most of the top-tier skins have cool patterns and look best with minimal wear or factory new. The lower-tier skins are often quite bland and having scratches / blood stains really makes them look much better, so I'll go with Battle-Scarred. Some of the low-tiers look amazing all scratched up and blood-stained, and pair incredibly well with halloween loadouts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike Hawk Posted August 31, 2015 Share Posted August 31, 2015 My FT purple range looks FN with blood stains on it which I think is really cool. Otherwise I would say FN. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.