Jump to content

backpack.tf trust doesn't make sense in the slightest


ada
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, ѕιи said:

So for the sake of discussion: would people actually be interested in completely wiping out all positive trusts if there was a rule implemented to require evidence?

 

That's not a good idea, especially for those who spent years to build up their reputation to where it's at right now.

 

----

If a rule was implemented to require evidence in trusts, trust could be split into two categories (eg: old trust, new trust). The user would also get a disclaimer that this rule was added so that they would know before posting trusts.

 

That's just how I imagine it.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like the idea of leaving the old trusts but making it so that any new trusts show proof.  That might be a lot of work though, but it makes the most sense and will keep the older traders happy that all their hard work did not just disappear.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know for a fact that trust ratings where there was no trust given to the rating receiver (ie. paying first through F&F Paypal) get removed, but this system hinges on the ratings being reported. If it can't be proved either way, the rating remains, which makes it rather easy to manipulate if a concerted effort was made by multiple parties.
Remember that you can always insist on a trusted middleman if you have any misgivings. If they insist on using their own middleman, or outright refuse, abort the trade and report any accounts involved to Steamrep directly - just don't expect a ban.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...