Jump to content

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Chief D

Please, avoid the 1 scrap change suggestions. It's basically rep-whoring and you should be ashamed.

Recommended Posts

AwesomeMcCoolName

that's xTH3RM4Lx for you

I thought he was banned for making horrible suggestions....was the ban really that short....

 

P.S. Thermal, if you're reading this, dafuq are you doing? you've been around for months yet you still can't break a 50% acceptance ratio.....You should probably read through the "How to make a suggestion guide".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
MC22

I did this twice.

but I had overwhelming proof to support me.

(ex. 8 sellers at a scrap below prev high end)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
MC22

but srsly, 0.11-0.33 to 0.22 to 0.33 is a huge change

plus key suggestions

oh boy

looks like a rec change monthly

in the meantime people sell succesfully 2 scraps higher than bp.tf

then ragers at the rec change going to be so bad

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
MC22

Make your own suggestion.

But then he would contradict himself.

Because for that he needs a scrap change. Plus the dip* community always downvotes UCs going up.

 

I do not particularly one scrap change, but I don't see what is wrong, as long as plenty of evidence.

 

In grimdercell's case, not that much evidence, but I think he wanted to get rid of the 1.11, he proved it with what he could.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
AlwaysBorn

Make your own suggestion.

As I said, I'm not gonna do 1 scrap change suggestions unless if it's really neccesary.

It's just funny in my opinion that a 1 scrap change suggestion got accepted while previous range was more accurate.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
✔ P I X E L A T E D ✔

The people who do this don't read the forums though? :/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
RuffRyders

Yes, he is very annoying. Keeps repwhoring. I dont mind scrap changes if proof is very overwhelming, tons of people selling cheaper and are unsold for example

 

But I believe the admins should do better too

 

http://backpack.tf/vote/id/5151aefe4bd7b87c0a000015 Tries to bring price up

http://backpack.tf/vote/id/515714a9ba25367e58000002 Tries to lower it

 

His proof wasnt even that great and it showed current range is fine.

If these kind of prices are accepted, then you encourage them.

 

I see many tryharding and making useless suggestions, trying to find trades desperately outside of current range (which is just fine). Providing few outliners and then trying to bring price down. It's too easy to bring a price down on bp.tf. Many have selective proof. It disturbs me that most of time these suggestions pass.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
∞Ramses

http://backpack.tf/vote/id/5150111e4bd7b88530000008 - I already resuggested

http://backpack.tf/vote/id/515023a04bd7b8674c000001 - Luv shenanigans.

http://backpack.tf/vote/id/514eeab44bd7b8804700000d - "Show that these can't be bought at 0.22" - "sure i will do it a bit later on if thats ok?" 

Also a lot of other vintages...

 

His proof is always so old.

 

 

I want to resuggest the vintage jarate, but that would be considered as repwhoring...  :huh:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Triforce of Charmanders

Inb4 key suggestion flame war

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
{SLTV} Laggylaptop

I occasionally make 1 scrap changes, I'm sorry. But they are sometimes needed, some of them were just made because a certain item wasn't quite a flat price at the time but has changed to them. The more accurate a price is on backpack.tf, the less complaining people tend to do about the site itself. 

 

While some are for sure not needed (like many of xTH3RM4Lx's), they are not all just for rep.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Chief D

Obviously I'm not talking about keys. Those would be the exception. And we can't just stop accepting them because they are "accurate". 

 

I remember how the prices used to be 0.11, 0.22, 0.33, 0.33-0.66, 0.66, 0.66-1, and so on. No 0.22-0.55 or weird ranges like that.

 

Also, it's easy to post proof for, let's say, 0.33-0.44, then 2 days later for 0.33-0.55 because you avoided the 0.55 links on the 0.44 suggestion. I've seen it happen before and it's annoying. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The Killjoy

As long as the rep whoring is a correct range, I don't see the issue.

If it's not then it should be closed regardless shouldn't it

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Chief D

As long as the rep whoring is a correct range, I don't see the issue.

If it's not then it should be closed regardless shouldn't it

We have enough suggestions to work with as it is. And as I said above, some people do the 0.33 to 033-0.44 to 0.33-0.55 and so on. I'm saying "avoid" it. I gave a clear example of why I said it with the link I posted.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
MC22

need more mods :P

hue

 

As long as the rep whoring is a correct range, I don't see the issue.

If it's not then it should be closed regardless shouldn't it

As long

 

I see what you did there

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...