cleverpun Posted February 2, 2014 Share Posted February 2, 2014 http://backpack.tf/vote/id/52e3f00d4dd7b8da078b4569 Only had a single trade for high end. Getting more than a key for these things is absolutely impossible. http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/17668168 6.55 ref (outlier)http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/17643074 7.22 refhttp://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/17452468http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/17675568 1:1 http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/17624705 (me, haven't sold any after 3 days. Only 27 views, probably will lower my price at this rate)http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/17576656http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/17409304 1 key + 1 rec http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/16821634http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/17180147http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/16470121http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/17624705 1 key + 2 rec I can't find a single visible sale among any of these links. From personal experience, these things are impossible to sell for a key + rec; anything above a key flat is complete luck, and doesn't deserve to be in the range EDIT: sold one after I posted this topic--sounds like an outlier XD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
polar Posted February 2, 2014 Share Posted February 2, 2014 Better than the previous range with community support. these things are impossible to sell for a key + rec; anything above a key flat is complete luck, and doesn't deserve to be in the range Then make a suggestion for 1-1.1. Oh wait.. you can't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cleverpun Posted February 2, 2014 Author Share Posted February 2, 2014 Better than the previous range with community support. Then make a suggestion for 1-1.1. Oh wait.. you can't. A rec would be ~.05 keys, not .1. The fact that it took me posting this topic to sell one at this price still doesn't speak volumes for it's easiness. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Distinctively Vincent Posted February 2, 2014 Share Posted February 2, 2014 It had been up for days without a counter-suggestion in sight. I would have accepted as well. It's not an item with a cooldown, so accepting it doesn't prevent others from refining it. In that regard, being that it improves on original price and had votes behind it, far better to accept and wait for someone to improve further than to both go against community vote AND leave it at an even worse price. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
polar Posted February 3, 2014 Share Posted February 3, 2014 A rec would be ~.05 keys, not .1. The fact that it took me posting this topic to sell one at this price still doesn't speak volumes for it's easiness. I completely agree that even the current range is probably too high, but my approach on suggestions improving the range over a previous range is to accept if the community is behind it. I would definitely not close that suggestion and leave the range at 1.1-1.2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cleverpun Posted February 3, 2014 Author Share Posted February 3, 2014 I completely agree that even the current range is probably too high, but my approach on suggestions improving the range over a previous range is to accept if the community is behind it. I would definitely not close that suggestion and leave the range at 1.1-1.2 Fair enough, though it is a bit frustrating having a clearly incorrect piece of information appear to be recently updated Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The G What ™ Posted February 3, 2014 Share Posted February 3, 2014 Fair enough, though it is a bit frustrating having a clearly incorrect piece of information appear to be recently updated I've been sayin it. This philosophy needs to be re-thought. I've missed quite a few suggestions with shitty proof or no proof, but when the range is "better but not accurate" it goes through. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cleverpun Posted February 3, 2014 Author Share Posted February 3, 2014 I've been sayin it. This philosophy needs to be re-thought. I've missed quite a few suggestions with shitty proof or no proof, but when the range is "better but not accurate" it goes through. I have asked suggestors to close and resubmit with a better range before. I have also accepted suggestions that were "better but not accurate" just as Polar did here. It's usually a question of whether votes back it up and how big the discrepancy is. Here, I though the difference big enough to be misleading. I can see why Polar accepted it, however, and I might be biased due to personal experience (which is why I started this topic instead of posting in the price update request thread) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aearsears Posted February 3, 2014 Share Posted February 3, 2014 btw cleverpun gratz on 1000th post Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cleverpun Posted February 3, 2014 Author Share Posted February 3, 2014 btw cleverpun gratz on 1000th post You could have easily commented on my user page instead of in this thread :/ but thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.