F CHARLIE Posted January 22, 2014 Share Posted January 22, 2014 Recently there was a suggestion made to drop that hat. Proof was given but I believe something was missed. The open trade that was listed on top had an offer on the first day that verified the old rangeindividually. Why accept the suggestion and not discuss the un-accepted offer? Now as some of you may know I have my own interest in this hat and I am fine with price drops but it seemed as if there was an oversight in that suggestion. It may have had something to do with kevin being the suggestor again (it really shouldnt be allowed to have the same person get 2 in row on the same hat). Also, there was no need to accept as the price was not out of date. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
♠Derpeh♤ Posted January 22, 2014 Share Posted January 22, 2014 Recently there was a suggestion made to drop that hat. Proof was given but I believe something was missed. The open trade that was listed on top had an offer on the first day that verified the old rangeindividually. Why accept the suggestion and not discuss the un-accepted offer? Now as some of you may know I have my own interest in this hat and I am fine with price drops but it seemed as if there was an oversight in that suggestion. It may have had something to do with kevin being the suggestor again (it really shouldnt be allowed to have the same person get 2 in row on the same hat). Also, there was no need to accept as the price was not out of date. http://backpack.tf/vote/id/52ddba914cd7b85c3e8b456b i believe this is the one you're talking about? http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/17119835 the link you're talking about has a b/o of 14 buds. Anything over that is the overpay, as the user would be happy to accept 14 buds, seeing his b/o at 14 and past sales which were lower i dont see the issue with this update. EDIT: not to mention a miami bonk boy would take ages to sell which is most likely the reason why seller didnt take it Also the original suggested price for that hat was 14-16 buds, meaning that the price was indeed out of date as it was lowered to 12-14 buds. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AwesomeMcCoolName Posted January 22, 2014 Share Posted January 22, 2014 it really shouldnt be allowed to have the same person get 2 in row on the same hat. What if the person makes a suggestion and screws up, so he closes and resuggests immediately. That would be a stupid rule. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
puddingkip Posted January 22, 2014 Share Posted January 22, 2014 I remember when I had a streak of 5 or 6 in a row within 1.5 month #backinthedayswhenlifewaseasyandsoundtrackamod Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
F CHARLIE Posted January 22, 2014 Author Share Posted January 22, 2014 http://backpack.tf/vote/id/52ddba914cd7b85c3e8b456b i believe this is the one you're talking about? http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/17119835 the link you're talking about has a b/o of 14 buds. Anything over that is the overpay, as the user would be happy to accept 14 buds, seeing his b/o at 14 and past sales which were lower i dont see the issue with this update. EDIT: not to mention a miami bonk boy would take ages to sell which is most likely the reason why seller didnt take it Also the original suggested price for that hat was 14-16 buds, meaning that the price was indeed out of date as it was lowered to 12-14 buds. It was late and I forgot to add that this suggestion pushed him to change his B/O from 15.5 to 14. What if the person makes a suggestion and screws up, so he closes and resuggests immediately. That would be a stupid rule. I can't believe you didnt understand this. To the hat owner it could appear as if Kevin has an interest in lowering this hat, especially as it wasn't out of date. In the end it having a lower price probably helps me but it seems like a failure has occured here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slocumruls Posted January 22, 2014 Share Posted January 22, 2014 I understand what you're getting at. Seller posts trade at Price X within current range Rejects within Current Range Unusual offer (for whatever reason of his own choosing) Suggestor Suggests with new price below BO of current seller Suggestion possibly accepted prematurely Seller Lowers buyout to actually sell hat This could be a problem but it doesn't happen much for high end hats like that. The accepting mod should probably however explain his reasoning. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
F CHARLIE Posted January 22, 2014 Author Share Posted January 22, 2014 I understand what you're getting at. Seller posts trade at Price X within current range Rejects within Current Range Unusual offer (for whatever reason of his own choosing) Suggestor Suggests with new price below BO of current seller Suggestion possibly accepted prematurely Seller Lowers buyout to actually sell hat This could be a problem but it doesn't happen much for high end hats like that. The accepting mod should probably however explain his reasoning. I am talking with the guy and he isn't into trading, just a player who likes stuff (thank god and need more like him). He thought it was appropriete to reflect the sites price. He put the b/o back at the previous number now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.