aaroncsn Posted May 1, 2015 Share Posted May 1, 2015 Sigh, don't know why this got accepted either...no proof on that either :/ http://backpack.tf/vote/id/55393a25b98d88652a8b46ac It was being moved to the random craft hat blanket with the low end raised to 1.33 refs instead of 1.22 refs since all random craft hats should not be lower than that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShadowMan Posted May 1, 2015 Share Posted May 1, 2015 Sigh, don't know why this got accepted either...no proof on that either :/ http://backpack.tf/vote/id/55393a25b98d88652a8b46ac Wait what? Now it's getting a bit more serious. It was being moved to the random craft hat blanket with the low end raised to 1.33 refs instead of 1.22 refs since all random craft hats should not be lower than that. Yet there was 0(zero) proof for 1.66. There was a thread about blind moving things to blanket. your turn pls Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aaroncsn Posted May 1, 2015 Share Posted May 1, 2015 The 1.66 refs was from the high end of the existing range. There were at least 100+ of these suggestions after the random hat blanket was updated. It was a quick fix to many craft hats and this hat sort of slipped through all those suggestions so i guess that was the rationale there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cares Posted May 1, 2015 Share Posted May 1, 2015 Wait what? Now it's getting a bit more serious. Yet there was 0(zero) proof for 1.66. There was a thread about blind moving things to blanket. your turn pls Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShadowMan Posted May 1, 2015 Share Posted May 1, 2015 -pic- Thanks, i'm out, that's kinda weird anyway, relying on sales that happened a month ago (Victoria's example) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cares Posted May 1, 2015 Share Posted May 1, 2015 Thanks, i'm out, that's kinda weird anyway, relying on sales that happened a month ago (Victoria's example) I only created these suggestions for items that were updated less than a week ago at that time. I checked to make sure there were no sellers at 1.22 either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
regi Posted May 2, 2015 Share Posted May 2, 2015 It was being moved to the random craft hat blanket with the low end raised to 1.33 refs instead of 1.22 refs since all random craft hats should not be lower than that. I'm unsure if this rule is an official rule though. I managed to get ~15-20 suggestions in doing this but I saw some other people get declined. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hexlicious Posted May 2, 2015 Share Posted May 2, 2015 Puddington has done a good chunk of mistakes, but the backpack.tf community can easily fix such a mistake if it's spotted, just like I did with the Festive Wrangler.Although such mistakes shouldn't happen, they do, but are easily fixable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HarryG Posted May 3, 2015 Share Posted May 3, 2015 This one was based off an unbumped seller http://backpack.tf/vote/id/5545bad3b98d88c15b8b47be Don't know why it was accepted Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Surs Posted May 3, 2015 Share Posted May 3, 2015 This one was based off an unbumped seller http://backpack.tf/vote/id/5545bad3b98d88c15b8b47be Don't know why it was accepted Yeah that doesn't make sense to why it was accepted, 1 unbumped seller at 16 isn't valid at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Woifi The Viking Posted May 3, 2015 Share Posted May 3, 2015 Yeah that doesn't make sense to why it was accepted, 1 unbumped seller at 16 isn't valid at all. Interesting that he is selling them for 17 yet drops the price to 16. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HarryG Posted May 3, 2015 Share Posted May 3, 2015 It looks like he sold a bunch of them and then dropped the price based on invalid proof right after he did so tbh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kevin the Chicken God Posted May 3, 2015 Share Posted May 3, 2015 puddington is a good mod, I'd just much rather have him post reasoning for accepting or declining things rather than have him sift through tons of suggestions per day, and not give the suggestors any feedback Puddington has done a good chunk of mistakes, but the backpack.tf community can easily fix such a mistake if it's spotted, just like I did with the Festive Wrangler.Although such mistakes shouldn't happen, they do, but are easily fixable. not always, the suggestion that really set off alarms to me was with the cloud 9 cannonball http://backpack.tf/vote/id/5495cef1b88d88293d8b482bthis suggestion was accepted, however there was sooo much more proof to be found that puddington completely ignored this suggestion I made addressing that issue: http://backpack.tf/vote/id/549764a3b98d8857308b4878, however people had already lowered prices according to bp so I closed it, ended up costing me around 15 keys Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
regi Posted May 4, 2015 Share Posted May 4, 2015 http://backpack.tf/vote/id/5541b9c1b98d88686b8b4635 How was this accepted? 5 key still sells as shown by the other suggestion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Woifi The Viking Posted May 4, 2015 Share Posted May 4, 2015 http://backpack.tf/vote/id/5541b9c1b98d88686b8b4635 How was this accepted? 5 key still sells as shown by the other suggestion. But majority at 4.5 I guess and also 4 keys. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
regi Posted May 5, 2015 Share Posted May 5, 2015 But majority at 4.5 I guess and also 4 keys. So the mods are then allowed to ignore all the given "if there's a sold above your highest end and it's not an outlier then you must include it" rules? Sales from the rejected suggestion; http://backpack.tf/vote/id/55446538ba8d8856468b4606 . Credit to Roller. http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/25727185 http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/25805863 http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/25840682 http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/25819168 http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/25709297 http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/25840068 http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/25815690 http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/25839059 http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/25737375 http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/25794214 http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/25807599 http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/25825077 http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/25829837 http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/25805863 http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/25821958 http://imgur.com/8kOGK2u [Credit to Brizio] http://prntscr.com/70al1f [Credit to 2+2=?] http://imgur.com/TkwWPsG [Credit to Xosmin] I looked through the suggestion that got accepted; http://backpack.tf/vote/id/5541b9c1b98d88686b8b4635 and I found these links that seem to have sold: http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/25822065 [was 5 at the time of sales] http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/25815690 http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/25800545 http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/25794214 http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/25570628 http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/25822134 http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/25817786 http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/25807599 http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/25825077 http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/25814486 http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/25829754 http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/25805863 http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/25828261 http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/25828799 http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/25822121 http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/25829316 http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/25820257 http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/25819168 http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/25827467 http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/25826675 http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/25787957 http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/25779349 http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/25826455 http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/25825008 http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/25824149 + More That, in my opinion, would be enough to prove this suggestion was falsely accepted and the price should be reverted by Fiskie or someone else. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Discovery Posted May 5, 2015 Share Posted May 5, 2015 Don't have tons of problems with this, but he also accepted a few of my suggestions fairly quickly: http://backpack.tf/vote/id/5546183ab98d887e5b8b48a9 http://backpack.tf/vote/id/55461fadb98d880c5c8b4838 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
♫ MoPcKo cBuH4e :d Posted May 5, 2015 Author Share Posted May 5, 2015 http://backpack.tf/vote/id/5546f28fb98d88d2178b45fb No proof for low end yet accepted. Ok then. If this continue like this I will be quiting bp.tf for good. Sorry, but apparently nothing have changed since the last time I quit. This time I won't be back. And I am sure that me missing will be a loss for the site since I suggest all the time and I'm one of the top contributors... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gent♥ Posted May 5, 2015 Share Posted May 5, 2015 http://backpack.tf/vote/id/5546f28fb98d88d2178b45fb No proof for low end yet accepted. Ok then. If this continue like this I will be quiting bp.tf for good. Sorry, but apparently nothing have changed since the last time I quit. This time I won't be back. And I am sure that me missing will be a loss for the site since I suggest all the time and I'm one of the top contributors... Mopcko, don't play the ''its them or me'' card in this situation, because it's obvious who everyone has no choice but to pick, and you leaving does nothing to help the situation - if anything it makes it worse. Be on my screening team and help me push that through, that resolves the issue <3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Surs Posted May 6, 2015 Share Posted May 6, 2015 http://backpack.tf/vote/id/5541b9c1b98d88686b8b4635 How was this accepted? 5 key still sells as shown by the other suggestion. I was thinking that myself, there were plenty of sales still happening at 5, and other suggestion still goes through. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roller Posted May 6, 2015 Share Posted May 6, 2015 #PuddingtonBestMod Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baloo Posted May 6, 2015 Share Posted May 6, 2015 Yes, he should remain a moderator. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jacobmeister Posted May 6, 2015 Share Posted May 6, 2015 I think I remember seeing an old forum post explaining the change from USD values w/ bud blanket to bud values, and puddington saying that he preferred the more general pricing, like if there's offers around 3.2 and 3.4 and sales at 3 and 3.6, just let it be really nice number like 3-3.5. He seems like the sort of person that would rather estimate the value of something using a fair bit of logic and common sense, and would rather have nice, generic values that are easy to understand rather than having all that 1-1.05 key range crap It's just the way he works as a moderator, it looks like - every time something is accepted on his behalf that may look iffy, it's generally a judgement call. I personally believe he should stay a moderator (a LOT of normal item suggestions are accepted on his behalf and he's still one of the bigger traders in TF2 currently, as well as one of the most prolific) simply because even though he's slipped up before, everyone's bound to. His mistakes seem to be a lot more obvious though - I'm sure if you look hard enough, every staff member has made at least one mistake Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
♫ MoPcKo cBuH4e :d Posted May 6, 2015 Author Share Posted May 6, 2015 Mopcko, don't play the ''its them or me'' card in this situation, because it's obvious who everyone has no choice but to pick, and you leaving does nothing to help the situation - if anything it makes it worse. Be on my screening team and help me push that through, that resolves the issue <3 Sorry, it's too late. I am making one or few more suggestions and I am done with this site. The harm has been done. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
♠Derpeh♤ Posted May 6, 2015 Share Posted May 6, 2015 Sorry, it's too late. I am making one or few more suggestions and I am done with this site. The harm has been done. ( ´ â–½ ` )ノ゛ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.