Cookiesurvival Posted February 25, 2015 Share Posted February 25, 2015 I'm not happy again, do you want to know why? Its because everyone is too closed minded again. I posted a suggestion on lowering the cost of a Strange Classic, until and invalid counterargument has been set in. Like, I got a problem with people always looking at the tiny words and saying,"Hey, that's what I should be talking about" instead of if that's a good idea. Mostly when if I was about to add more information about my research, but my suggestion for a price has already closed down. Since I can't comment why on that suggestion, I will ask it here. So now tell me, what is wrong with this suggestion without saying "bad evidence" : http://backpack.tf/vote/id/54ee2d08b98d8809598b458a P.S. That 28 trades were all the trades that was found at Outpost. P.S.S. I don't care if you hate me for thinking a different way. :/ P.S.S.S. Since I know this will automatically backfire, P.S. ftw. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JakeTheAwesome Posted February 25, 2015 Share Posted February 25, 2015 You're right, this probably is going to backfire instantly. prepare yourself Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BOOM! Posted February 25, 2015 Share Posted February 25, 2015 bad evidence ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kevin the Chicken God Posted February 25, 2015 Share Posted February 25, 2015 young+unbumped proof, lots of it had already sold and one link was just a quickbuying trade Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cookiesurvival Posted February 25, 2015 Author Share Posted February 25, 2015 young+unbumped proof, lots of it had already sold and one link was just a quickbuying trade I checked, you lied. Only 1 is sold on that proof list, and 2 were outdated. But the other 8 proofs are fine and are evidence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prince Lowell Posted February 25, 2015 Share Posted February 25, 2015 That flamethrower trade tho. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ŴƬЯ-A Vakume Kleener Posted February 25, 2015 Share Posted February 25, 2015 The proof is pretty bad Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scout608 Posted February 25, 2015 Share Posted February 25, 2015 its definitely because of sexism, racism, and the fact you're new here and the fact your proof wasn't good Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Puddkingkip's Selfie Posted February 25, 2015 Share Posted February 25, 2015 lmao that "evidence" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weedoof Posted February 25, 2015 Share Posted February 25, 2015 Link #1 - Not bumped since creation Link #2 - Not bumped since creation, sold anyway. Link #3 - Not bumped since creation Link #4 - Quickbuyer trade. Read up on why those aren't valid. Link #5 - Not bumped since creation, sold anyway. None of the trades in the 2nd block are valid for lowering a price. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ŴƬЯ-A Vakume Kleener Posted February 26, 2015 Share Posted February 26, 2015 Also it's not at all if you "Think an item should drop". It's flat hard proof, that you did not have Please know your place in the community and take advice and use it instead of taking it as an attack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cookiesurvival Posted February 26, 2015 Author Share Posted February 26, 2015 Link #1 - Not bumped since creation Link #2 - Not bumped since creation, sold anyway. Link #3 - Not bumped since creation Link #4 - Quickbuyer trade. Read up on why those aren't valid. Link #5 - Not bumped since creation, sold anyway. None of the trades in the 2nd block are valid for lowering a price. Also it's not at all if you "Think an item should drop".It's flat hard proof, that you did not havePlease know your place in the community and take advice and use it instead of taking it as an attack Good Job, you fail the forum test! Did you read the Question? It asks what's wrong with this suggestion other then "bad evidence". Then you told me the "Bad Evidence". So closed minded you all are. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kevin the Chicken God Posted February 26, 2015 Share Posted February 26, 2015 I checked, you lied. Only 1 is sold on that proof list, and 2 were outdated. But the other 8 proofs are fine and are evidence. Lower then Original Costs: (5 out of 28 differ trade offers) http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/25153018 <--- young and unbumped, technically evidence but very poor http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/25099541 <--- sold http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/25174663 <--- sold http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/25072220 <---quickbuyer - invalid for the suggestion http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/25170509 <--- sold ---------------------------------------------------------- Higher then Original Costs: (6 out of 28 trade offers) http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/25162729 http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/25164642 http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/25167018 http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/24967326 http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/25124835 http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/25095145 this section of proof does nothing for your suggestion is your proof, normally Sugarcube or someone will come in and be all hostile towards new suggestors, rare to find the suggestor himself being this composed yet still being hostile your question of "what is wrong with this suggestion other than bad evidence" is pointless, all a suggestion is is evidence Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cookiesurvival Posted February 26, 2015 Author Share Posted February 26, 2015 your question of "what is wrong with this suggestion other than bad evidence" is pointless, all a suggestion is evidence. Ok, you win. I know this is now "Bad Evidence" But are you that close minded and stupid to claim "Suggestion is Evidence". Suggestion is an idea, an opinion, so what are you thinking? Besides you failed the Forum teat anyways. You only focus on the small things but not the question. The question is what is wrong with this suggestion other then the "Bad evidence"? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zirune Posted February 26, 2015 Share Posted February 26, 2015 Ok, you win. I know this is now "Bad Evidence" But are you that close minded and stupid to claim "Suggestion is Evidence". Suggestion is an idea, an opinion, so what are you thinking? Besides you failed the Forum teat anyways. You only focus on the small things but not the question. The question is what is wrong with this suggestion other then the "Bad evidence"? Literally all a price suggestion is is evidence. If you have good evidence, it gets accepted. If you have spotty evidence, it gets researched and added to and might get accepted with that, otherwise it's rejected. If you have awful evidence, it gets rejected. Nothing else matters. The opening paragraph in your suggestion is pointless. It does not contribute evidence, it does not add useful context to the evidence (such as why some sales are considered invalid or quicksales), it does not add to the suggestion. Others have already pointed out the flaws in your evidence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
puddingkip Posted February 26, 2015 Share Posted February 26, 2015 http://forums.backpack.tf/index.php?/topic/75-guidelines-for-suggestion-question-threads/please reade this guide to learn how to set up a suggestion question thread. I'm not happy again, do you want to know why? Its because everyone is too closed minded again. I posted a suggestion on lowering the cost of a Strange Classic, until and invalid counterargument has been set in. Like, I got a problem with people always looking at the tiny words and saying,"Hey, that's what I should be talking about" instead of if that's a good idea. Mostly when if I was about to add more information about my research, but my suggestion for a price has already closed down. Since I can't comment why on that suggestion, I will ask it here. So now tell me, what is wrong with this suggestion without saying "bad evidence" : http://backpack.tf/vote/id/54ee2d08b98d8809598b458a P.S. That 28 trades were all the trades that was found at Outpost. P.S.S. I don't care if you hate me for thinking a different way. :/ P.S.S.S. Since I know this will automatically backfire, P.S. ftw. If you want to get a serious discussion going starting off by saying that everybody else is close-minded is a very bad idea. Gathering evidence is something you are supposed to do beforehand, not after making the suggestion. And suggestions are all about little details. If you want help on how to create a good suggestion, here is an excellent guide: http://forums.backpack.tf/index.php?/topic/792-how-to-make-a-good-suggestion-bullet-points-version/. Oh and second p.s. is a p.p.s. not a p.s.s. because p.s. is an abbreviation for post scriptum, Latin for "after what has been written" so the thing to be after that would be a post post scriptum and thus a p.p.s. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.