Jump to content

what should i do if i feel like some successed price suggestion is wrong?


DIXON CIDER

Recommended Posts

what happened was, a price drop of an unusual i own, has passed

 

within the suggestion, there're three of "1:1 sales" which i found invalid

 

the suggester used only the hats' owner history and not trade post links

 

in the 3 sales he claimed to be 1:1, at least mine was not, i added about a bud to do an upgrade

 

and in the other two i found no evidence of them are both 1:1 trade

 

here's the link of that price suggestion: http://backpack.tf/vote/id/53c770aa4dd7b81c0a8b4568

 

all 3 of sales shouldn't be a valid proof, am i right?

 

if so, what should i do? should i make a new suggestion point out that the previous suggestion was invalid and suggest the "new price" back to what it was?

 

please somebody help, i've never suggested a price 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

what happened was, a price drop of an unusual i own, has passed

 

within the suggestion, there're three of "1:1 sales" which i found invalid

 

the suggester used only the hats' owner history and not trade post links

 

in the 3 sales he claimed to be 1:1, at least mine was not, i added about a bud to do an upgrade

 

and in the other two i found no evidence of them are both 1:1 trade

 

here's the link of that price suggestion: http://backpack.tf/vote/id/53c770aa4dd7b81c0a8b4568

 

all 3 of sales shouldn't be a valid proof, am i right?

 

if so, what should i do? should i make a new suggestion point out that the previous suggestion was invalid and suggest the "new price" back to what it was?

 

please somebody help, i've never suggested a price 

Then make a suggestion with a proper range and proper proof.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Then make a suggestion with a proper range and proper proof.

Is it valid if I just point out that the previous one was invalid, and the price shouldn't be moved?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is it valid if I just point out that the previous one was invalid, and the price shouldn't be moved?

No, because you'd have to prove the old range was correct then.  If you're going to update it, give us proof of the current market.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrators

Is it valid if I just point out that the previous one was invalid, and the price shouldn't be moved?

No, it isn't. You can't just say "its invalid" you have to prove with your counter suggestion that the one which was accepted was wrong with proper proof.

 

 

Anybody can claim "Its invalid" Like we said...Counter-suggest with proper range and proper proof if you feel like its completely invalid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't see anything wrong with it at all. If you feel its wrong, feel free to counter-suggest with proper range and proper proof.

As I said, the suggester claims those he post are 1:1 trades but in fact not.

 

I don't have new proof to support the old price but neither does him has the proof to support his price :/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, because you'd have to prove the old range was correct then.  If you're going to update it, give us proof of the current market.

he owns one, that's why he's unhappy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrators

As I said, the suggester claims those he post are 1:1 trades but in fact not.

 

I don't have new proof to support the old price but neither does him has the proof to support his price :/

 

If you really added a bud over the top of your unusual counter-suggest with link of your inventory history. Don't know how to do that? Check HERE

 

Other two links looks fine to me. If you have proof of your claim and all, the new range should be 2.5 - 3.2

I meant 2.3 - 3.2 buds

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you really added a bud over the top of your unusual counter-suggest with link of your inventory history. Don't know how to do that? Check HERE

 

Other two links looks fine to me. If you have proof of your claim and all, the new range should be 2.5 - 3.2

Yea but 1 sale doesn't seems well to get a suggestion thu ._.

 

 

 

 

And thanks for you guys, guess I better get thu with that new price :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrators

Yea but 1 sale doesn't seems well to get a suggestion thu ._.

 

 

 

 

And thanks for you guys, guess I better get thu with that new price :P

 

Well, if you have proof of your history providing you added 1 bud over the top, then the new high -end should be 3.2 buds.

 

Then you have proof of 2.3 and 2.5

 

So, the new range could be 2.3 - 3.2 buds if you could provide the proof that you added 1 bud + your old unusual(Anger)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, if you have proof of your history providing you added 1 bud over the top, then the new high -end should be 3.2 buds.

 

Then you have proof of 2.3 and 2.5

 

So, the new range could be 2.3 - 3.2 buds if you could provide the proof that you added 1 bud + your old unusual(Anger)

Emmm, I don't understand, how do you determine the low end and the high end??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrators

Emmm, I don't understand, how do you determine the low end and the high end??

 

Simple...The low-end is coming from the suggestion (Sale 3). All I did for the high end is added +1 to the total value (2.2) which becomes 3.2 

 

Again, remember 3.2 is only valid if you really added a bud on top of your old unusual (Anger).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Simple...The low-end is coming from the suggestion (Sale 3). All I did for the high end is added +1 to the total value (2.2) which becomes 3.2 

 

Again, remember 3.2 is only valid if you really added a bud on top of your old unusual (Anger).

I checked my trade history, I didn't added 1 bud, but now I'm sure I added 10 keys to meet up the old low-end

 

And buds were 18 keys by the time I traded (8 Jul)

 

So how's the range should be??

 

https://photos-4.dropbox.com/t/0/AACASebvdEfoFmqaBTGdUmVBSkGYqbdqExtAJqyuEt9HYA/12/41846552/png/1024x768/3/1405782000/0/2/fgddgdg.png/GTb8zyI8yFmd5dpyC8o6aXAkix3NpwbEwcMNuZRbX30

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrators

I checked my trade history, I didn't added 1 bud, but now I'm sure I added 10 keys to meet up the old low-end

 

And buds were 18 keys by the time I traded (8 Jul)

 

So how's the range should be??

 

https://photos-4.dropbox.com/t/0/AACASebvdEfoFmqaBTGdUmVBSkGYqbdqExtAJqyuEt9HYA/12/41846552/png/1024x768/3/1405782000/0/2/fgddgdg.png/GTb8zyI8yFmd5dpyC8o6aXAkix3NpwbEwcMNuZRbX30

 

2.3 - 2.8 should be right. ^_^

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2.3 - 2.8 should be right. ^_^

Thank you  :)

 

Could you please kindly do that suggestion for me??

 

Because suggest on a hat I own is just stupid and not seems going to success...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrators

Thank you  :)

 

Could you please kindly do that suggestion for me??

 

Because suggest on a hat I own is just stupid and not seems going to success...

 

Yeah sure, ^_^

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not really a participant on backpack.tf but I had to sign in to the forum just to comment on this...

 

I don't see anything wrong with it at all. If you feel its wrong, feel free to counter-suggest with proper range and proper proof.

 

 

You don't see anything wrong with that suggestion? There wasn't a single verifiable trade in there, yet it got approved. There is every chance that none of those trades were 1:1. There was no evidence given to suggest that any of them were.

 

 

Done, hope you are happy now xD :P

 

http://backpack.tf/vote/id/53ca76884cd7b82e0f8b4568

 

This isn't helping the credibility of backpack.tf pricing. The new suggestion is still based on 2 trades that are mere speculation with no supporting evidence and only one actual known trade. And yet approved again...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...