Hatch Rawer Beryl Posted April 26, 2013 Posted April 26, 2013 Previous key suggestion from 2 days ago: http://backpack.tf/vote/id/517745f04bd7b8fe10000001 That suggestion had just as much proof as my last suggestion. It was closed by Vincent because Long posted a few lame links to outliers. This was only a minor bump. There was no other suggestion, higher nor lower. My last suggestion: http://backpack.tf/vote/id/517956a84bd7b84836000002 This was my most recent suggestion. The links were fresh, but roughly the same in quality, quantity, and type as my previous suggestion. Tf2finance hadn't changed much since my previous suggestion. However, this suggestion was accepted instead: http://backpack.tf/vote/id/5178b190ba25362d57000011 A suggestion suggesting a higher price than what I was suggesting. Are you serious? The market did not change much at all between my first and second suggestions. The proof was roughly the same as well. My first suggestion was closed for being too high, and my second suggestion was closed because another higher suggestion was accepted. Well, you can blame this on different mods having different opinions but... This is not okay. Get it together. Decide whether you are going to report the actual price, or if you just want to make minor bumps only in the price of keys. *I apologize if I have made any grammatical errors, or if I repeated myself. This was a rant.
MC22 Posted April 26, 2013 Posted April 26, 2013 Previous key suggestion from 2 days ago: http://backpack.tf/vote/id/517745f04bd7b8fe10000001 That suggestion had just as much proof as my last suggestion. It was closed by Vincent because Long posted a few lame links to outliers. This was only a minor bump. There was no other suggestion, higher nor lower. My last suggestion: http://backpack.tf/vote/id/517956a84bd7b84836000002 This was my most recent suggestion. The links were fresh, but roughly the same in quality, quantity, and type as my previous suggestion. Tf2finance hadn't changed much since my previous suggestion. However, this suggestion was accepted instead: http://backpack.tf/vote/id/5178b190ba25362d57000011 A suggestion suggesting a higher price than what I was suggesting. Are you serious? The market did not change much at all between my first and second suggestions. The proof was roughly the same as well. My first suggestion was closed for being too high, and my second suggestion was closed because another higher suggestion was accepted. Well, you can blame this on different mods having different opinions but... This is not okay. Get it together. Decide whether you are going to report the actual price, or if you just want to make minor bumps only in the price of keys. *I apologize if I have made any grammatical errors, or if I repeated myself. This was a rant. 5 refined was obviously in range.
~shenanigans Posted April 26, 2013 Posted April 26, 2013 We've decided that we are going to accept whatever the most accurate price is. Many small bumps on key prices causes a lot of unnecessary rage, and leads to a new suggestion right after one passes. We might implement a cooldown time for keys soon, that is being debated.
Santa Heavy Posted April 26, 2013 Posted April 26, 2013 We've decided that we are going to accept whatever the most accurate price is. Many small bumps on key prices causes a lot of unnecessary rage, and leads to a new suggestion right after one passes. We might implement a cooldown time for keys soon, that is being debated. Screw the cooldown just go with the most accurate price. c:
MC22 Posted April 26, 2013 Posted April 26, 2013 2 days later: 5.33-5.66 would be most accurate. Then it'll stop at the brad 6
Hatch Rawer Beryl Posted April 26, 2013 Author Posted April 26, 2013 We've decided that we are going to accept whatever the most accurate price is. Many small bumps on key prices causes a lot of unnecessary rage, and leads to a new suggestion right after one passes. We might implement a cooldown time for keys soon, that is being debated. Great. As long as it's consistent. I got cheated out of a suggestion twice because of inconsistency.
Joshua Cain Posted April 26, 2013 Posted April 26, 2013 We've decided that we are going to accept whatever the most accurate price is. Many small bumps on key prices causes a lot of unnecessary rage, and leads to a new suggestion right after one passes. We might implement a cooldown time for keys soon, that is being debated. Just require that key suggestions show a 1 rec change in order to accept
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.