MrDeepDarkmind Posted September 8, 2016 Share Posted September 8, 2016 To scare people like trump all you gotta do is ruin their reputation and take all the money then use it against them because they are filled with greed but who is the worse of the worse let's see I think trump can be worse but Hilary reputation is bad because the filthy lies but to me in general all what matters is I don't care who becomes president this time Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jessica Posted September 9, 2016 Share Posted September 9, 2016 https://twitter.com/Oathill80/status/758260914793615361 this sums it up good enough if hillary becomes president. In my personal opinion it sums up if either of them become president. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hyperqube Posted September 9, 2016 Share Posted September 9, 2016 In my personal opinion it sums up if either of them become president.Yeah, I don't even get how this applies to Hillary. She's mostly considered to be Ombama's third term. And she doesn't seem to be the type of person who easily gets triggered, or to spew nonsense and escalate situations. ... unlike someone else. If you don't want war, you know what's bad for the U.S.? A president who threatens to kill innocent people just because of their famility ties. A president who doesn't want to take NBC warfare of the table. etc ... A persident that gives ISIS soundbyte after soundbyte, that they don't even need to rip out of context, that they can point to and say "look, see how they are the evil guys!? join us!" A president that doesn't get that these extremlists are not threatened by bravardo and immoral attacks - but they are emboldened by it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
♠Derpeh♤ Posted September 9, 2016 Share Posted September 9, 2016 Yeah, I don't even get how this applies to Hillary. She's mostly considered to be Ombama's third term. And she doesn't seem to be the type of person who easily gets triggered, or to spew nonsense and escalate situations. ... unlike someone else. The "Hillary is considered to be Obama's third term" was thrown out the window when the scandals and underhanded tactics she used to one up Sanders when he started to become a threat. Not to mention there are a few more which are going to public in the coming weeks which hackers are hinting that will change everything. They are both horrible end of story. One is an idiot who seemingly has the mind of a moody teenager and the other is a habitual liar, lacks empathy and somewhat psychotic... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hyperqube Posted September 9, 2016 Share Posted September 9, 2016 One is an idiot who seemingly has the mind of a moody teenager and the other is a habitual liar, lacks empathy and somewhat psychotic...Err ... Remind me again which one of those two descriptiosn doesn't describe Trump? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
♠Derpeh♤ Posted September 9, 2016 Share Posted September 9, 2016 Err ... Remind me again which one of those two descriptiosn doesn't describe Trump? Tbh I think it's funny that you think Trump is in any way shape or form being serious, the guy changes his tune every week to fit what is popular/trending he tries to appeal to the lowest common denominator and does/says the most outrageous shit to get PR. The fact that you're so emotional about what what you think Trump might do if he gets voted in proves this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hyperqube Posted September 9, 2016 Share Posted September 9, 2016 (edited) Tbh I think it's funny that you think Trump is in any way shape or form being serious, I don't think he's serious, but that doesn't mean he's not a habitual liar, lacks empathy and somewhat psychotic... (though perhasp 'somewhat' might be debatable ) Edited September 9, 2016 by Hyperqube Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#NewWizard Posted September 25, 2016 Share Posted September 25, 2016 Vote boys, every one from anywhere is welcome. Cast your votes: https://worldwide.vote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hyperqube Posted September 25, 2016 Share Posted September 25, 2016 Question. I've heard various states allow voting already. Anyone know if any this happens in the swing states, and if their result is representative? Vote boys, every one from anywhere is welcome. Cast your votes: https://worldwide.vote I voted twice. hope that's not a problem? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#NewWizard Posted September 25, 2016 Share Posted September 25, 2016 I voted twice. hope that's not a problem? You can vote once per IP, though I don't think it's a big problem if someone votes twice. If these pools reach 100k votes, few duplicates wont really matter that much. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hyperqube Posted September 25, 2016 Share Posted September 25, 2016 LOL. looked at the results United States (21453) Trump: 90% Sure... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Professional Map Painter Posted October 7, 2016 Share Posted October 7, 2016 http://www.politico.com/story/2016/10/donald-trump-comments-women-democrats-reaction-229308 http://www.politico.com/story/2016/10/mike-pence-donald-trump-comments-women-229311 http://edition.cnn.com/2016/10/07/politics/john-podesta-emails-hacked/index.html https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/784491543868665856 It's over. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hyperqube Posted October 8, 2016 Share Posted October 8, 2016 odd ... I would have presumed Pence be like "No, you're wrong, Donald didn't say that". He was on a roll in the VP debate selling such nonsense, so why stop there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hyperqube Posted October 8, 2016 Share Posted October 8, 2016 ... and just, when you thought, it could get any worse. DFQ is up with Trump (now)? When he's gonna bring back "Law & Order" ... If DNA evidence proves someone else raped the victim, that would kind of, like, you know, prove innocence? Hey, U.S.A.? Look high into the sky. Up there, yes, above the clouds. Yeah, that thing. That's rock bottom. Congrats. -- some random comidy show, on Trump Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#NewWizard Posted October 10, 2016 Share Posted October 10, 2016 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The One Posted October 10, 2016 Share Posted October 10, 2016 According to NY Times' The Upshot, Clinton has a 86% chance of winning. http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/upshot/presidential-polls-forecast.html?rref=collection%2Fsectioncollection%2Fupshot&_r=0 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#NewWizard Posted October 10, 2016 Share Posted October 10, 2016 According to NY Times' The Upshot, Clinton has a 86% chance of winning. http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/upshot/presidential-polls-forecast.html?rref=collection%2Fsectioncollection%2Fupshot&_r=0 So you say there is 14% chance of Trump winning? I'll take those odds. Upsets are so fucking common it's ridicolous Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cave Posted October 10, 2016 Share Posted October 10, 2016 Honestly, if I was an American I would vote for Trump, I'm not racist or anything. But it's just that I'll never trust Clinton with so much power, since most of her voters are feminists who say "Oh look, a female running for president! Here, take my family's votes!" Trump's voice really is relaxing to me, and I would like an ASMR from him. That's why I'm voting for Trump! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hyperqube Posted October 11, 2016 Share Posted October 11, 2016 ... yeah ... pretty much. You'd expect someone running for president to comprehend the speration of powers this country is based upon. No, Donald Trump, you can't decide who goes to jail. No, Donald Trump, you can't just keep re-opening closed cases. They tried that with Bengazi. EIGHT times. I never realised that, when he said "Lets make America great again", he was going back to the time of the witch-hunts. One more for the list, Lets throw our political opponents in jail Budi 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#NewWizard Posted October 11, 2016 Share Posted October 11, 2016 I never realised that, when he said "Lets make America great again", he was going back to the time of the witch-hunts. One more for the list, Lets throw our political opponents in jail lmao, criminals deserve to serve a sentence. You honestly believe Hillary was innocent? People get put away for way less than she did Tats 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#NewWizard Posted October 11, 2016 Share Posted October 11, 2016 I never realised that, when he said "Lets make America great again", he was going back to the time of the witch-hunts. One more for the list, Lets throw our political opponents in jail lmao, criminals deserve to serve a sentence. You honestly believe Hillary was innocent? People get put away for way less than she did Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crazyy Cow Posted October 11, 2016 Share Posted October 11, 2016 John oliver can help you Sniper Noob 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hyperqube Posted October 11, 2016 Share Posted October 11, 2016 You honestly believe Hillary was innocent? My oppinion? When a republican would be able to prove Hillary a criminal, they would be set for life.Ergo, they would have SERIOUS incentives to work as hard as they can. 10 republican led Bengazi investigations found no ground for criminal charges on the e-mails, the republican led FBI was unable to find ground for criminal charges (1) My oppinion is that if the investigators don't find grounds for criminal charges a person shouldn't be charged for criminal charges - and thus not convicted - and thus not jailed. (2) It is also my oppinion that a presidential candidat, who's not had acces to the details of an investigation, is in no position to judge a person for guilty or not guilty (3) Thirdly, in my oppinion, presidential candidats should have the mental capacity to understand the above two statements How about you tell me. Do you agree with these three statements or not? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Penguins Posted October 11, 2016 Share Posted October 11, 2016 lmao, criminals deserve to serve a sentence. You honestly believe Hillary was innocent? People get put away for way less than she did So put the burden on the defendant and assume guilty before proven innocent because they way you say it now is that without any evidence at all, you automatically assume Hillary is already guilty. Your point for other people getting putting away for less is technically an argument, but presumably they were proven guilty. Admittedly, this is an idealistic interpretation of the US justice system but this is how it works. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#NewWizard Posted October 12, 2016 Share Posted October 12, 2016 So put the burden on the defendant and assume guilty before proven innocent because they way you say it now is that without any evidence at all, you automatically assume Hillary is already guilty. Your point for other people getting putting away for less is technically an argument, but presumably they were proven guilty. Admittedly, this is an idealistic interpretation of the US justice system but this is how it works. We already have all the facts, all the proof. Aren't the emails and server already hard evidence? The fuck are you smoking? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now