linus Posted July 31, 2015 Share Posted July 31, 2015 I'm not too experienced with Unusual Pricing, so I have several questions on two recent (and related) price suggestions. 1. How did this C. Heart Muff price suggestion get passed using outdated SBTWC HKC price of 290 keys, without the need for a mini? http://backpack.tf/vote/id/55b732f9ba8d8884118b45ca 2. After the C. Heart Muff price suggestion passed (180 keys) using the aforementioned SBTWC HKC, how is it valid to use it's new price in price suggestion for SBTWC HKC? http://backpack.tf/vote/id/55b8b70aba8d88de0f8b4567 This baffles me but perhaps there is a flaw in my understanding, so all input is welcome. Thanks in advance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kevin the Chicken God Posted July 31, 2015 Share Posted July 31, 2015 the HKC price had actually just passed over 3 months outdated, so it's valid proof the new HKC suggestion should be closed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lmf Posted July 31, 2015 Share Posted July 31, 2015 if a suggestion is done by The One or Gent, no one can argue ;( Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
A Delicious Cashew Posted July 31, 2015 Share Posted July 31, 2015 As I told you on chat, the hong kong cone had a valid price at the time as it was at 3 months. The muffs suggestion is fine. However, the new hong kong suggestion should be closed since its price is based off the muffs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
linus Posted August 2, 2015 Author Share Posted August 2, 2015 Thanks Chicken God and Cashew for the explanations! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.