Jump to content

How did this pass.


HarryG

Recommended Posts

Posted · Hidden by puddingkip, May 4, 2015 - No reason given
Hidden by puddingkip, May 4, 2015 - No reason given

The fact that you own one yourself tells a different story

Link to comment

The fact that you own one yourself tells a different story

Besides the point, isn't it? The suggestion is invalid, whether I own one or not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

mods do a lot more research than they post in the comments, puddington accepted it and has a lot of experience with them

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Research? What? There is one still Unbumped seller used to show 16 in the suggestion making it invalid, but it got accepted. And again I've seen other threads discussing this 'blind-accepting'. If this research justifies the new price then I'll gladly throw my hands in the air and walk away, but for now I'm just not seeing it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The fact that you own one yourself tells a different story

 

Did you even look at the suggestion? Uck.

 

mods do a lot more research than they post in the comments, puddington accepted it and has a lot of experience with them

 

If mods do additional research they're supposed to report it. Transparency is something we strive for here, and if additional research WAS done (which I doubt), then it should have been noted in the comments.

 

There's a lot of threads popping up like this recently, hence I've proposed my screening / peer-review system. Threads like this are just evidence it is necessary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Glad I'm not the only one seeing the issue here. Should I try and 'counter' pointing out the issue in the accepted suggestion or leave it as is?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Glad I'm not the only one seeing the issue here. Should I try and 'counter' pointing out the issue in the accepted suggestion or leave it as is?

I'd leave it for now unless you can prove sales above 16. There's an (hopefully) impending change to prevent this sort of thing in future. Any other grievances you may have, voice here:

 http://forums.backpack.tf/index.php?/topic/35764-should-puddington-be-a-mod/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted · Hidden by puddingkip, May 4, 2015 - No reason given
Hidden by puddingkip, May 4, 2015 - No reason given

The fact that you own one yourself tells a different story

^^^

rekted lel

Link to comment

As long as we're talking about suggestions that shouldn't have gone through, the last update fro the Misty Skull Desert Marauder was invalid.

 

http://backpack.tf/vote/id/54f2dd9eb98d88541b8b4783

http://backpack.tf/vote/id/54f3fd2cb98d88455b8b4749

 

First suggestion shows that it "prolly" sold for 6 buds after a month.

Second suggestion shows that it never did sell, with Geel choosing to raffle it instead, and includes a screenshot of the winner's trade history proving it.

 

Oh, but back to Puddington, who could forget the infamous Heavy Lifter suggestion. If i remember correctly, it had only unsolds at the time of suggesting, and yet...

http://backpack.tf/vote/id/540dd09eb88d88c46e8b4658

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Last hellfire milkman price update have no idea how it passed... You can tell something is wrong just looking at the price...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...